|
Democratization of Industrialization
The impetus is to spread the technology. This has been in effect since the beginning of the age of technology.
The advent of the aspirant of technology was the rule. As measurement became more standardized and
existent, purveying a sufficient aspect of the politic, so the capacity to technologize occurred and grew.
The next aspect was the coexistent standards of protocols between political states. The first of these was the
coexistence of city states in the European sector which began to spread the technology to outsourcing
locales such as the colonies which later became an enlargement of the former European
existence, now no longer city state unity but county state unity.
So blossomed the status of the rule and as the rule refined (also called measurement), the technological
apparatus grew smaller, leading to internal combustion engines and in the early twenty first century, the internal electric engine.
Then, therefore, the rule, as it's called (by me), became more and more refined. Herein is a more amazing argument as to the factoring of said rule. It's a question of prosperity and functionality. Which rule might be more
expedient? The Charlemaingne, divisible by twelve, or the Metric, divisible by decal, or ten. Circumstantial evidence points to the combination of the united county states system and it's
dozen rule.
As the rule miniaturized and therefore the fractal element of the former units became manifest, so the capability of the technology, the state of the art, became more
miniaturized. There is now, therefore, also another argument or discussion as to weather the apparatai of synthesization can become sub-atomic in size and occupy an
existence situated well below the sizing of any object occurring in the natural realm.
But the underlying principal, the heretofore unnoticed critical aspect, is and has always been the rule. If therefore, more than
adequate attention is given to the realm of the rule and all it appertains, you readers or anyone realizing this will leap beyond the usual geometric progression of development of said rule. It's the understanding of the rule that commands the
precedent in the cutting edge of any aspect of the state of any art in all technology.
Ah, but I digress. The attention should be again directed to the afore considered
democratization of industrialization. The loss of jobs, however inevitable should be countered by adaptation. The potential of the human worker has always been ignored. With the command of the rule must go retraining of the most critical component, the human worker. Because it seems to be the instinct of man to carry the rule and the
industrialization abroad in ever increasing increments.
You cannot seek to hang on to the unstoppable. It's like the corps of engineers trying to control the
Mississippi River.
Copyright (c) 2005 by Paul A. L. Hall. All rights reserved.
back
|