|
Orbiting Vectors
Escape velocity may have more to it than just the sense of traveling into orbit
around a planet. It may also help us to understand, for example, the speed of
the electron around a nucleus. How so?
Our friends, the cosmologists, are scratching their heads at the prospect that
their beloved atom conceived of by the ancient Greeks, is really not the atom at
all. In fact, there may not be an atom, or, as it were, in modern "hamburger"
distorted and enfeebled English, the smallest form of matter. So now they got
their catchall phrase, "quarks", as in "Quarkie, Baby!" -- But you know, this
really is an infinite universe, and it's expanding.
So we can begin with the assumption that there is a magnitude beyond the
galactic and there is a mineatude beneath the quark. And I'll tell you right
now, Buddy, unless you've got some kind of microscope capable of seeing them,
you can probably forget your idea of the little wiggly filaments, although it's
a cute one I must admit.
What we're probably looking at here, is a mineatude progression of form, a
tendency to digress from the filamentary on the quasi galactic scale progressing
to the sphereoidal tendency of electrons orbiting a nuclear mass, and what
experts may be reading below the quark may be an actual stretching of distance,
giving a filamentary appearance to particular expansion faster than the speed of
light. Hence, nuclear power, or energy equivalent to the speed of light times
itself.
Cosmologists tend to visualize, these days, a "fabric" of space which seems to be
subject to distortion and, at times, even the occasional rupture. But what they
may actually be sensing is the slower exterior of magnitude tending to react in
a sense that we would describe as gravitation, or a slower exterior tending to
buckle and attract to a faster or accelerating interior, giving the illusion of
gravitational force, and other similar type phenomena of velocities,
where the
mineatude is faster than the magnitude, or, in other words, acceleration
emanates from the epicenter.
So, we see, that as all this expands outward, as it were, there is an orbiting
phenomena that on a multi-galactic scale conforms to a filament-type structurality. And we may think of this as an extension of orbital velocity; that it
is the tendency of galaxies to orbit the structural mass of the original
epicenter, while at the same time conforming to a filamentary structure.
This may also be what we might consider, or have considered in the olden days,
so to speak, "gyroscopic force". That the gyroscopy of the galactic tends to
exert a filamentary force, or conformity to a magnitudinal expansion
characteristic. But here on a solar scale, in our frame of reference, we see
that bodies tend to orbit one another, in cooperative orbits, such as our own
moon around the Earth, or in dominant orbits, such as Titan around Saturn.
It reminds me of the joke of the sailor who went into orbit. He was rowing a
boat ashore when a shark swam up, got a little peppy, and took a chunk out of
one of his oars! Well, that qualifies as an ore-bit, and that's close enough. I
also went into orbit, on a technicality. I actually went twice around the Earth,
but along the jumbo jet highway, so to speak, making multiple landings, but
that's kind of like an orbit in a way, isn't it? -- Even if it did take me
almost 30 years. But I guess you have to really go at escape velocity the way
Yuri did, the first guy to actually orbit the Earth so long ago to really
qualify as a genuine orbiter. At least we can qualify as being composed of
trillions of mineatudinal orbits in our molecular makeup.
Now this involves mathematics in a certain way, because we seem to be dealing
with a progression here, that can be calculated numerically -- at least
partially, enough to squeak by if it ever comes as such things as practical
applications of technologies, and so on. And it also involves geometry.
The calculation of a magnitudinal proximic to a mineatudinal and expansive body
is a proportional deceleration away from the epicenter causing it to travel in a
tangent to an expanding sphere. As these bodies get larger, and involve
multiples of these orbiters, they conform to the cosmic string phenomenon, so
that their expansion and their tangentinnal orbitrations become filamentarrised
so as to lend credence to the concept that these contorted filaments give the
impression that they are a part of a fabric.
But what really seems to be happening is, as a collective
magnitude of
mineatudinal orbitrations start to tend to function as a collective, they
exhibit another tendency of velocities, heretofore thought of as magnetic force,
or an alignment of expansive directions which seem to increase velocities more
in one direction than others. The proverbial refrigerator magnets seems to stick
without glue to the side of the steel paneling on a fridge, when in reality the magnetized iron is
aligned, as it were, toward the iron in the steel panels of the fridge, giving it a "secondary
gravitational" phenomenon, or a departure from our sphereoidal expansive
tendency from the mineatudinal epicenter into a more cylindrical form of
gravitational, or, more properly, expansional primary and secondary velocities,
which causes intermediatary aspects such as a solar system to flatten, and more
massive aspects, such as the cosmic conglomerate of galaxies to filamentize.
Space may expand faster
along the length of a filament because of the secondary gravitation it
generates. And it could be noted that it may be the tendency of the cosmos
to adjust to any action taking part within it.
So the tangent of expansion of magnitudinal bodies reacting with mineatudinal
eppicentarial expansion tends to appear as an orbit around a sphere, and as the
outward expansion tends to minimize, being pushed by expansion from the
epicenter, objects tend to seem to either adhere to a surface, or form a
secondary gravitational phenomenon where both primary and secondary cause it to
form strings. Therefore the strings tend to receive the buckling affect, similar to our experience,
as we seem pressed to the surface of the Earth in the presence of what appears
to be gravitation. Although our buckling effect manifests as
skelitalization, or the calciffic
flocculation in interpretation of structural stress, which also disappears
very rapidly when these stresses are absent.
What therefore causes the exterior to keep from collapsing on the interior?
There is more to space then the solid matter we can perceive. I went over this
in my article in the cosmos section, that dealt with the prospect of other
nonmaterial aspects of the cosmos, also involved in this expansion, in fact
perhaps causing it, that also has substance but is nonmaterial. This may even
be the essence of the expansion, and may be dragging matter out with it, matter
all the while composed of energy itself, that has a uniform variable of
graduated deceleration, but on such a minimal degree that this translates into
objects being attracted onto a planetary body, solar system material orbiting a
star, elliptical bulging phenomena in a galaxy, and ultimately the filamentation
of extensive continuations of galactic materials, or galaxies.
Or should I say "ultimately" ? No. I should much rather say, "infinitely". And
that applies to both magnitude and mineatude, with that mineatude expanding from
an infinite number of points. So the universe is expanding from an infinite
number of points. So what are those large objects noted by Hubble
astronomers and others way out at a seeming edge of the universe? Cosmic
string conglomerates like the one we inhabit. Yarn balls of milky ways, if
you want to put it into colloquialisms. It's a lot bigger out there than
lots of these smug little know-it-alls would like to admit.
I mean, we know where the
local Aristotelians are coming from, always wanting to be in the center of the
universe and naming everything after their polytheistic imaginations that they
are indeed the center of it all and on and on, blah, blah. The reality is
that they are just as insignificant as the rest of us, so get over it.
Enough of that incompetence.
And then we go beyond that; beyond our material
world of matter, into historic existences, completely different from the realm
of matter, of quarks and galaxies and cosmic strings and so on. We can begin for
openers, kid, to actually be looking at an infinite number of existences, each
one behaving diametrically differently than the other. Now that's a little more
like it. A little more like the awesome reality we really exist in.
So there are mathematics
involved in calculating the constants of the universality of all observable and
undiscovered forces, such as gravitation, magnetism and gyroscopy, as well as
calculation of the variables of u.v.g.d., or the uniform variable of graduated deceleration.
Then there is the geometry involved, which illustrates the tendency of
substantial and nonsubstantial mass to expand in orbiting vectors or at a given
constant of a tangent from the aspect of primary expansion. In this
existence, spin is everywhere.
Click here to return to "Proxemics".
Click here to return to "The Vorticees of Tornadic Activity".
Click here to return to "The Universality of Substance".
--Fine art,
digital art,
music,
several voice
introductions by me about my work, articles about
my artwork
and other topics such as
sociology,
the cosmos,
economics,
education,
medicine,
poetry,
humor,
something I call premonitions,
and a series about covered bridges,
all by
yours truly, the webmaster, Paul A.L. Hall. There are
feedback,
a website search engine, and exhaustive
contents pages. Plus
my weblogs are
on site, an
art
school and
classes.
...this involves mathematics in a
certain way, because we seem to be dealing with a progression here...
Copyright (c) 2005 by Paul A. L. Hall. All rights reserved.
Primary and secondary gravitational expansion may cause cosmic filaments, and
this involves geometry...
02 April, 2005
|