A Good Healthy Distance
You can run but you can't give'em the hiding they deserve.
Well, you can tell it was a Hall that discovered -- or uncovered -- the most important dimension ever to any living species, the dimension of spacing, or the natural separation between things, especially organisms. Hall discovered proxemics, I don't remember when, but somewhere about over one hundred years ago, now if he had a snazzy name such as Von Braun or Einstein, or Oppenheimer, or Pasteur, maybe people would have taken him seriously and we would have had a magnificent civilization now instead of the unhealthy mess humankind is in at this time.
But you can tell that he was taken with a grain of salt and treated like someone that had come up with something cute; close but no cigar. And so the global population has been coming down with one fatal epidemic after another, all the time looking for cures. And finding some, but even those are not some magic bullet, but rather mostly using what's already there, like the immune system.
But the immune system of each individual works at optimum capacity at the correct spacing of one human being from another. This means that it is actually the correct proxemics that is the magic bullet cure of disease. But such a cure won't work under the present system where the appropriate proxemics can only be had by those of means. One need not be altruistic to observe that if the poor get sick, the rich will come down with it as well soon thereafter. Hey, make no mistake, rich guy, getting sick is one hellova way to die. It's a torture compared to starving, freezing, a guillotine or a quick bullet.
It's all in the proxemics and it has to be for all or it won't work. Too close and they break down or get sick. You see, here's a situation where intelligence can actually get in the way, because usually all people can think about is money. Actually brains and economics are at the core of the problem. Because only the ones who go by intuition can escape.
It's now common knowledge that the flue mutations are annually originated in China. That, by the way, is not due to ignorance, but surprisingly, intelligence. The incredible resourcefulness and the inherent genius of the people, much to their credit, and also their hard work and industriousness, admirable as it is, has been actually working against them. A lot of illness came down that silk road throughout the ages.
It's not what you know, it's what you don't know. And there is a balance between intelligence and intuition. I think that's how Hall discovered the dimension in the first place. It was intuitive. Just like another Hall, a farmer, who discovered how to separate aluminum from it's ore in his barn. What's with the Halls? It's a common name. And with the larger numbers, the chances are greater that something great will emerge. That's a reason why it's important that the human population reach more appropriate levels. The odds are far greater that the appropriate people will emerge that can make significant contributions to the common good in a higher population level. Tamper with the level and keep it low and all you get are puny minds emerging that can do nothing more than destroy each other and the environment.
You know, proxemics is a very important statistical dimension, it is calculable and can not only tell us how much space we need, but also how much space is left. It shows that the planet can easily sustain ten to fifty times the human population that now exists. How to feed them is not part of this article, but suffice it to say, yank agriculture out of the bronze age and you'll gain three hundred percent more arable land and working knowledge of how other species can collaborate with humans to produce incredible abundance. Enough to feed not only the people but millions of new emergent species. I mean, get real, people. Start thinking outside of the box for a change and survive.
There is one given in our equation. The human being can live anywhere on the Earth or elsewhere perhaps up to three G's. This would tell us -- at last -- without guesswork, what would be a reasonable ceiling for the human population. I'm confident you'll find the figure somewhere around five trillion, three hundred and forty billion, something like that. Maybe more. -- In safe, functional, comfortable communities everywhere on the globe.
And that's with a county system of village networks with only administrative cities. But don't worry. I'm not some kind of Utopian that would try to rework the world of humankind into some sort of brave new world. Let's leave the brave out of it. People react in extreme alarm and resort to any measures when confronted with life-threatening disease. Build it and they will go. Make it a dot gov and they will move. They're ready to go now. They were ready to go at the first outbreak of saars. As the king said in the din of battle, "my kingdom for a horse". I guess they were saying, "yeah, pal. In your dreams".
We have a legal base to operate from concerning business, vehicular traffic and other things like firearms, and so forth. But not concerning certain conditions that guarantee catastrophically terminal illness for a significant sector of the population if violated. There are codes and laws in place for dwellings, but not for concentrations of population. It's bad for their health and therefore those who instigated such enterprises and structures that caused overcrowding should face citations and even imprisonment. But let's not talk justice here. I would, but I know you'd never pay attention. Admittedly, we live in the real world of shades of gray.
These people are your income and you are theirs. If they get herded together and they get stressed, they will be certainly far less productive, much less innovative, and you lose out on taxable income. Just for openers. The appropriate use of a national territory is for it's income in terms of productive populations. It's not just good economically and in terms of public health, but it's even good for the environment, because when people realize that their health depends on acceptable integration with the environment, they'll do it.
This also has to do with ecology, because the human being is a part of the ecosystem; it's an organism. You who think the human being should be separate from nature, go back to school. You're just pretending to be knowledgeable. You're the worst criminals of them all and I can see right through you. You don't want to save nature, you're the ones, and those who hold your leash, who really are out to destroy nature. The reason why humans have been so antiecological is because of lack of working contact with the real world, the natural world.
Let me show you how it works. The key is in spacing of persons. When the appropriate spacing is observed, the taxable income rises exponentially. We're not talking twice the income here. You get the spacing right and the numbers will follow, and that's after you spent on infrastructure and other things like defense and so forth. We're looking at a surplus of seventy-five to eighty times what a country earns in taxes right now. Just as the re-integration of top carnivores is purported to have helped the environment, so the first ever integration of the human being into the ecology would increase the well-being of the environment, especially if the necessary accompanying legislation were in place.
And that's just for openers. It solves much of the disease problem. They don't get sick so that means you or your personnel or family don't get sick. But also business prospers. Not just a few landlords and some organized criminals eking out some riches from overcrowding, but with the appropriate separation of population and the appropriate level of population, you're looking at an extreme increase in prosperity of not only economics, but in the in the biotic potential of all other organisms as well. Humankind will have finally realized it's true meaning.
Do the research, which would be difficult and costly, so it probably will go undone, and you will find that our unhealthy society is largely caused by unnecessary overcrowding which is largely due to unethical business ventures capitalizing on inordinate concentrations of population density in metropolitan areas.
You think that stuff just happened? To some extent, but largely there's a lot of money to be made from piling people on top of each other and herding them together. It's a crime to manipulate people. That's why we have kidnapping laws. But that's what's being done. Each city on earth is an example of massive multi-manipulation of personnel by numerable and disparate concerns.
In one extreme interpretation of law, it's tantamount to kidnapping of massive numbers of individuals. But once again, talk justice and too few listen. We're also talking health, here. Freedom from pandemic death. Because that's where we're headed now. Pandemics from transmittable parasitic organisms. Lethal flues, incurable sexually transmittables, blood contact transmittables, airborne transmitables, water borne transmittables, vector transmitables, and pshchopathilogically transmitables (by people who love germs and love to kill). The list goes on about what's right around the corner and which will give you a drawn out and agonizing death. All crowd dependant.
When you look at solutions, you really haven't found them in the direct approach of medicine. That's only bought you time. The shots, the drugs, the hospitalization and so on. The real cure is the person. The multi-organism itself in the proper legally enforced proxemics from one another. We're even talking about laws in place that cite authorities for such details as violating the proxemics of students in a classroom. And there may be maximums as well as minimums.
So get with the program. This is the planet Earth, not some science fiction place of cyborg city-planets crowded with intelligent life up to the gills. If you don't do it within certain parameters it ceases to function. There will always be those with the false doctrine that the few survive at the expense of the many, but the reality is that each constituent of the universe has relevant significance and is necessary for the whole. Dispute that if you wish and miss out on the prosperity, the health and the well-being which has to be shared if it's to be had at all.
There's a wrong way and a right way. There's the person's opinionated way -- any of us -- and then there's the real way that the universe really functions. Up to now, the failure of human society is that it's been so opinionated. So, argue away. It may make you feel important now but it will make you sick eventually. It's as I mentioned before, you're entitled to your opinion, kid, but that doesn't change reality.
That's an argument you're going to loose. Big time.
Click here to return to the Coming Plague page
Click here to return to the Plague Triggers page
Click here to return to the Proxemics page
Links back to home pages and directory