The Propeller is Wrong
Home ] Up ] Far Since the Wright Bros -- Not, pt 2 ] [ The Propeller is Wrong ] Far Since the Wright Bros -- Not. pt 3 ]
 


The Propeller is Wrong



The propeller on planes and on ships and the fans in jet aircraft and the fans in ventilation equipment or forced air fans -- are all wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong.

I'll have to get into this later. But as I said before . it's not in the structure, it's in the element. What is needed more than anything is a far better and far greater understanding of air itself. You're dealing with an entire universe of physics properties here. This is immense; this is the key, this holds the secret to the functionality of any piece of equipment you're going to develop that has anything to do with air.

We basically know nothing about it. It may even be possible to have a forced air system without any fan at all. Maybe some of you guys have done that out there and you're just afraid to disclose it because of how fast ideas get stolen. For you, I can say this: for every idea some idiot steals from you, there are at least a million more right behind it. If you spent 10 years on an idea and someone stole it, they would never be able to do what you did with it, and you can work on a variation of that, which would only set you back fraction of the time, that would have nothing to do with the idea stolen.

There is an aspect of geometry, I think I must've worn this saying out here because I'm always talking about how everything is in the stone age, the bronze age, the dark age, I just about run out of ages to cliché the statement to. I guess I would have to relegate this problem to self-inflicted-with-dumbness-mankind relegating itself to the aerodynamic asinine age, and that just about comprises every human development throughout history. Enough about that. I'm so thoroughly disgusted and thoroughly disappointed at this point in my life with the dilema of humanity's lack of insight. Humankind's failure, false sense of achievement, unerring quality of disabling itself tends to overcome and surpass it's promise and potential.

To start off with your basic propeller needs to be a basic shape. I think you probably would make more progress if you did a series of sculptures about things ushering air past them, then if you tried to have your angular cut, Manatee-slashing propellers chopping up both sea and sky, and really getting you nowhere fast. It's the wrong shape, people. Some of these wooden propellers look beautiful, and I know you did a lot of work on them, there's no doubting that. And sincere kudos, plaudits and laudations -- hats off to you and all that. But, you know, we could have spent some time studying air itself and how it behaves.

I did a little research on what I call the infinity spinner, that rotates on a central axis, but operates lateral spoon-shape bowls, kinda like a teaspoon anemometer, but much more complex than that. It seems the secret is, and don't get me wrong, I don't know that much about it, I haven't been able to do the lab work nobody can afford that except those funded to find the golden BB such as a cure for cancer, or lifting body reentry vehicles so expensive that the whole secret of the technology is how to finance them. But what the infinity spinner involves, is taking a flat rectangle and joining the corners, only one pair of corners to one side. This does something like sit inside the fuselage, and is enclosed, and moves the aircraft by a combination of thrust to the aft and vacuum forward.

It isn't so much about it's final shape, but the totality of it's shape-history in relation to the substance it is working with, in this case a flat rectangle, then conforms to a transformation from two to three dimensions, in obedience -- but less obedience then a protocol-recognition of atmospherics -- to the substance and properties of air itself. In air we see, from our first encounter with it, that it exhibits two-dimensional behavior while at the same time being very much three-dimensional. So, you see, there is something to be argued about the scientific discipline of applied aesthetics, the use of the concept of the aesthete when approaching the science of the matter.



 

Click here to return to the article, "Bat Batters".

The propeller is wrong.  Wrong, wrong, wrong.
Copyright (c) 2005 by Paul A. L. Hall.  All rights reserved.
... the infinity spinner, combining two and three dimensions, housed in the fuselage....

 

02 June, 2005