The Influence of Microgravity on Human Behavior
Toying around with a juxtaposition, or collage of observation, I found myself in the position to visualize a new law of physics and if new to more than just me, I wrestled with naming the baby. I came up with the term "The Law of ... " I can't quite remember right now. It's in a paper somewhere in my website, I think the article on gravitation. It's getting so I have to start to take notes and study my own publications. The internet medium is a far greater tool of observation than is generally supposed.
Maybe toying is not a good word, but it is, actually if you consider we are children on a threshold of a new relationship with the universe.
I think it was called the law of necessary uniqueness or something like that. I observed that here on earth we can view things that originate in a point in time, mostly macro organisms, that
exhibit, among other things, a necessary uniqueness particular only to that organism observed. In particular, the human organism.
It came to focus that the human organism at some point or collective of micropoints in it's
origin acquired such remarkable, or at least noticeable, uniqueness from the others of it's kind that it
exhibited characteristics of being affected by it's position in the universe, and in fact in all
relativity at not only it's origin, but it's development and presumably the development of the ontogeny of it's genetic makeup.
To put it bluntly and in plain late 20th century English, each of us is a snapshot of the Universe. We are also much more than that, but this snapshot thing is considerable to say the least. It may also mean that secular trends observable in the flow of history are in part the result of the influence of
micro gravitation.
I further observed, in my so-far brief tenure in this existence, that in spikes of
micro gravitational flux, the reaction of common human nature has virtually invariably
been negative or in terms of behavior patterns of the fabric of society, belligerent. Hence I have come up with the article "War of the Worlds" in my website
(click here to go there), In which I ventured the prediction that the three dominant
microgravitationl sources, the sun, the moon, and a planet coming historically close to the earth (as Mars did in August of 2003), would have the collective
micro gravitational or tidal effect on human behavior to cause a delayed catastrophic effect that would be, how else could I put it? -- inevitably terminal to all life on earth in a relatively short period of historic (not geologic) time.
Let me remind the scientific community, and anyone else who would perk up here, that centuries of elaborate
advancement in instrumentation and discovery tend to blind the empirical mind to more obvious matters directly before us. In the 1960's the scientist was considered to be like the priest of a new religion, that of science itself. It was
supposed to become the solution to all the ills of humanity. Personally, I feel if mistaken zeal were to be more accurately placed, plumbing would have come closer than science. The real advancement in human civilization in coping with disease and the human
conciliation was plumbing and the plumber, of course with some science involved.
But the reality is, that, as stunning as discovery can be, for every thing discovered, multiples of new things are revealed that must yet be discovered. Thus the sequential path through
scientific progress results in exponentially more unknowns than knowns. Knowns and proknowns. A little humor there, really it's knows and unknowns.
Actually, birth control may be jokingly viewed here, were it possible, as the defeat of science, because were scientific
endeavor to cover new discovery successfully, and put a new scientist on each of the unknowns that resulted from new discovery, in about a decade, the entire adult population of the earth would be assigned to research on several unknowns each.
Without birth control that estimate would expand to about four decades. What if the kid would have been a scientist, in other words. You may scoff, but in the law of probability, as the numbers increase, so do the chances of a win. The more people, the more scientists. And the more of everything, I might add. More innovation to feed more hungry mouths. More expertise in solving the relationship of humans with the environment.
What's your problem, man? I've got a right to call a joke when I see it. You think you're going to solve problems by lessening human population? The smaller the numbers, the lesser the chances of the
emergence of the brilliant individuals necessary to solve those problems. I've got a better solution, how about getting rid of all those who think the earth is overpopulated. That'd eliminate a couple of billion right there.
The joke is, "overpopulation theorizing", and it's resultant underpopulation, is not science, it's selfishness. And selfishness never solved anything. There is enough room on this baron planet to easily accommodate more than sixteen billion honest people. How do I know. I've been out there twice around this virtually empty planet. It's conscious or unconscious propaganda to justify house arrest genocide of human beings by the selfish profiteers, the visible puppets of the Predators of Man.
You have to venture beyond the
tourist destinations to see the empty parts. You think people don't belong
there? People are a part of nature. They fit into an ecological
niche just like every other plant and animal. That's how they get
stability. Take them away from their habitat and voila. Violence,
insanity and conflict. And the natural world they're supposed to be a part
of and take care of is traumatized.
But back to the subject. All that may soon be a moot point. Such solution may be shortly determined by nothing but armed and unarmed conflict in a
myriad of natures including random violence on soft targets by those who simply desire to kill. A
possible aggravation of a negative reaction to micro gravitational stimuli.
Think of it as a "natural backlash". So for those of you who want to brain-wash the poor "impressionable majority" out there to cover up your stupidity and greed, you might just get your wish. Only when the time comes, you won't get any exemption. You'll be at the top of the list.
The natural backlash might destroy almost everyone. Realizing that I, too, am human, I must presume that such a backlash would entail far greater forces than those imaginable to us. Kind of like, perhaps, cosmic antibodies.
Click on any of the following to go there:
The Influence of Microgravity on Human Behavior
If the graviton penetrates
everything, perhaps it isn't a graviton.
http://www.paulhallart.com
is authored and created by Paul A. L. Hall.
Copyright © 2003 Paul A. L. Hall. All rights reserved.
You are creative enough to innovate your own material.
Microgravity. The necessary uniqueness of every minute section of the cosmos down to the smallest subatomic particle.
email: ph3@paulhallart.com --
click here to go to the feedback page.