A Peek at Performance
A drawing
by Paul Hall
of
a collage by Paul Hall

While training for and serving in the
capacity of my service job in Washington, D.C., "information
specialist" which the army codes as "71Q20", back in 1968, I had
the chance to get a bit of artwork done. When we were off duty, we had the
time off. I guess it's a little different from what I hear now, though I
never really had the chance to look into it, but it seems that a large number of
service men and women have to have other jobs when off duty in order to make
ends meet. A sad indictment on the establishment that they work for.
I had a job back in those days, too, but
just on Saturdays in a bicycle shop owned by Mel Pinto, one of the foremost
bicycle dealers in the D.C. and Virginia area. Now, it's not that the pay
was that low in the army. It's understood historically that military
salaries are lower than civilian ones and that those in military careers are
there for altruistic reasons. It's rather that the cost of living is
artificially high. We live in a world where people are allowed to charge
whatever they think they can get away with.
It is the government's responsibility to
assure that it's service men and women are sheltered from the economic duress of
the civilian world. This involves the responsibility of ensuring that the
spending power of the service personnel's service salary be totally commensurate
with the cost of living environment they are in and that said cost of living be
not more than one third of the individual's income after all deductions, such as
monthly tax deductions and so on.
It is also the responsibility of the electorate
to see to the termination of employment of any official that fails to do
so. Not that anyone's that responsible. It's not entirely their
fault, all such matters are obfuscated.
In a civilized world, the census bureau
and the department of weights and measures would have a mandate to measure
accurately what the public can afford and enforce prices accordingly.
Freedom of enterprise would involve the ethic of fairness to the customer, said
ethic from which any departing would meet with the teeth of sufficient
enforcement. Kind of like an economic F.B.I.
In a stable society,
in order for economies to grow, prices must remain fixed. It would be an enforceable
crime to be party to inflation. Anyone caught price gouging would be
imprisoned in low level security for the purpose of retraining and upon release
from prison, forbidden to ever again engage in their former enterprise.
Not to do so would deny the possibility of
some of the greatest minds and talent of any society emerging from the ranks of
the poor and lower middle class, where they would most often come from, as was
proven in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in the United States, where a
startling number of the greatest talent and leadership rose from the common
ranks and not any aristocracy.
Additionally, true aristocracy is nobless
oblige, which means using one's privileged position to acquire the ability to
more properly care for as many others as practicably possible on a multitudinal
scale. Seeing to the well-being of others. Therefore anyone with
such compunction is aristocratic, regardless of birth of station. Another
quality supposed to come to the fore in a democracy such as ours. But it
doesn't you see, because democracy is the weakest form of government.
So, anyway, back to the topic, a couple of
days a week, I had the time after duty to go to art school. And I found a
good one, in conjunction with George Washington University, the Corcoran
Gallery, the museum adjacent to the White House, had a school of art and I was
accepted. I was able to take a drawing class and a painting
class.
In the busy world of the mid twentieth
century, when space was so expensive as to be prohibitive, as it is to this day,
even more so, art school was a two-in-one thing for me, first it gave me the
chance to get more art instruction, which was always handy, and second, it gave
me a chance to use the space as I would a studio. So I was able to get
some work done.
"Performance" was a title I
would make up later because, I mean, you've got to call it something.
Oddly enough, the best art in the world is something that needn't make a
statement. Of course there's Picasso's "Guernica" and the
protestations of Goya and so on. Still works of art. Still of
renown. But the best art is there without need of any story or
statement. It is a spontaneous visual event. It takes the observer
beyond the limited boundaries of literature or the trite extents of
illustration.
You see, most people don't understand this
because it isn't an understanding, it's an experience; an uplifting
experience. Once they catch on, and anyone can, they just have to keep
looking for a while, then they understand the true value of art and many become
collectors, willing to sometimes pay incredible prices for art proven to be able
to deliver, such as Van Gogh's "Irises" which a few years back sold
for, I forget the exact amount, but over several million dollars.
Aha, you might now argue, and you think
charging a dollar for a bottle of water was price gouging, how about millions of
dollars for one little piece of artwork? Hey maybe you didn't know but Van
Gogh died early in life, a suicide, granted, but he was miserably poor, a victim
of the price gougers of his day in another democracy. Nobody bought his
work while he was alive, except for one person of average means, a great
individual. As the song goes, when Iris eyes are smiling, they laugh all
the way to the bank.
Van Gogh's brother subsidized his work,
and he, Theo, was an art dealer. That's why American Art has not seriously
contributed to the global concept of true classical art. There are no Rembrandts,
no Michelangelo's, no David's or El Grecos and so on. Oh, there are greats
over here such as Homer, Whistler, and so on, but nothing the rest of the world
is moved to acknowledge as truly classical world class great art. And why
do you think that is? Because of the frontier lifestyle or something?
It's because the truly great talent,
always there, has never had the opportunity to emerge. Over here it's
Rembrandt the stock clerk, El Greco the garage mechanic, Michelangelo the
factory laborer (oh, I'm sorry, I almost forgot that most factory labor is going
to the Michelangelo's of under developed nations where they can work'em on the
cheap). Each overqualified for menial jobs and therefore less adept at
them than those qualified.
You see, I know this world. I've
been there. And I alone am escaped to tell thee, as the saying goes.
So when I did this work, "Performance", we were learning about collage
in the drawing class. The assignment was to first do the collage and then
to do a drawing of it. This lent a legitimacy to the shaky medium of
gluing bits of paper and pictures and other stuff together, developed by the
cubists in the twenties; the nineteen twenties.
What's good about collage is that it can be
so speechless. The spontaneity so desirable in a successful work of
art. I've done collages before, and one of our best recourses was good old
"Life" magazine, because of it's huge pictures and adds. Man I
really miss that mag. But these days, it's not that good to use printed
material because they fail to see that you're using it like you would a tube of
paint. The best thing to do is go out with a digital camera and shoot your
own visual references and reprint them on the printer or maybe those big plotter
printers they have at places like Kinkos. Then stick pieces of those
together.
So after piecing together my pictures and
gluing them down, re-shaping them to suit my creation, I did the drawing using
the collage as a visual reference. But now I've come to separate the three
areas of the drawing into details as shown below. Oh and also it gave me a
chance to give attention to the strength of combined gender; the levels
of greatness that can be had by unity of genders, each with unique abilities, no
single gender having the capacity to act alone in a difficult world.
Just so, you cannot survive as a
civilization without great artists. That's why so much of our society is
not surviving. Go ahead and disagree if you want. That doesn't
change reality. That's why.

Detail 1: The art of
the performance.

Detail 2: The
performer.

Detail 3: The
audience.
Click
here to go to the Voice Introduction series
This series include the actual voice tour of works in the website by me, imbeded
as sound in the background. It should work on your browser, I know
Internet Explorer will work.
In the first Intro you can hear me talk a bit more about "Performance"
Click
here to return to the Dingleton Hill Covered Bridge page
Click
here to return to the Voice Introduction for Oil Paintings, Page Two.
Click
here to return to the Portrait of a Franz Kline Brushstroke page.